Publication

Ethnic and income-related inequalities in mental health among adolescents: a cross-sectional study in Bradford, UK

Open Access
BMJ Public Health
2026

Introduction

Poverty is a well-established determinant of adolescent mental health, but associations between ethnicity and mental health are less clear. We quantified inequalities in mental health and well-being among adolescents in Bradford, UK.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the Born in Bradford birth cohort, using surveys from 2023/2024 (ages 12–15). Participants completed validated measures of anxiety and depression (Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale 25), well-being (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale), emotional and behavioural problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire), loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale 4), eating-related problems (Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire-Short) and psychosis-like experiences (Psychosis-Like Symptoms Scale 8). We used linear regression to estimate associations with ethnicity and family income (measured by free school meals eligibility).

Results

We included 9496 participants (median age 13.9 years; 52.1% female; 40.9% Pakistani ethnicity; 34.4% white British ethnicity; 24.6% other ethnicities; and 62.0% living in the most deprived quintile of neighbourhoods in England). Compared with adolescents of white British ethnicity, those of Pakistani ethnicity had fewer anxiety and depression symptoms (Cohen’s d=−0.31, 95% CI −0.37 to −0.24); higher well-being (d=0.15, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.20), fewer emotional and behavioural problems (d=−0.40; 95% CI −0.48 to −0.32); less loneliness (d=−0.22, 95% CI −0.26 to −0.17), fewer eating-related problems (d=−0.07; 95% CI −0.11 to −0.02) and no evidence of a difference in psychosis-like experiences (d=−0.07; 95% CI −0.17 to 0.02). Estimates for other minority ethnic groups were less precise but generally suggested better mental health than white British adolescents. Adolescents eligible for free school meals had poorer outcomes across all measures: anxiety and depression (d=0.13; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.18); well-being (d=−0.17; 95% CI −0.22 to −0.12); loneliness (d=0.09; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.14); emotional and behavioural problems (d=0.14; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.22); eating-related problems (d=0.06; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11); and psychosis-like experiences (d=0.10; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.20). In exploratory sex-stratified analyses, girls reported poorer mental health and ethnic differences were wider among girls than boys.

Conclusions

Poverty was consistently associated with poorer adolescent mental health. Despite higher deprivation, Pakistani adolescents reported substantially better outcomes than white British adolescents, particularly for emotional and behavioural problems.

Access type

Open

Journal name

BMJ Public Health

Publication date

2026

DOI identification

10.1136/bmjph-2025-004528

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Stay informed and inspired — sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest updates, research insights, and ways to get involved directly in your inbox!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Born in Bradford letterpressed print
Born in Bradford logo
Privacy

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

For more information, please visit our Privacy Policy.