Afolabi E R I, Ayobode Asowo
The study compared the Traditional True Score Theory (TTST) and Modern Mental Test Theory (MMTT) estimated item parameter indices to the ability of examinees in Junior Secondary School Certificate Examination (JSSCE) in mathematics. This is with the view of providing an empirical justification for the appropriateness of decisions made statistically from psychometric tests. The study adopted a descriptive survey design. We randomly selected a sample of 600 students from a population of 95,419 students who sat for the 2016 JSSCE Mathematics Paper 1 in Oyo State, Nigeria. An adopted version of the 2016 Oyo State JSSCE Mathematics Paper 1 titled Mathematics Test (MT) instrument was used for information aggregation. We analyzed data collected using SPSS and BILOG-MG software packages. The effects showed that the difficulty indices of mathematics test items based on TTST ranged from 0.00 to 0.65. The discrimination indices ranged from 0.00 to 0.41. Fifty-two items (86.67%) on the MT items had moderate item difficulty (0.200 ≤ p ≤ 0.620). 42 (70%) on the items discriminate poorly (0.10 ≤ D ≤ 0.29). Regarding MMTT results, the item difficulty parameter ranged between 0.216 and 7.988 for 2PLM, while the discrimination parameter ranged between 0.100-0.729 respectively. There was a negative relationship between the difficult indices of MMTT and TTST models (r =-0.702, p < .01). The concomitance correlation for discrimination was positive (0.646, p <. 01). The study concluded that the Oyo State 2016 JSSC Mathematics examination was of a moderate psychometric quality, irrespective of the theoretical measurement model used in the appraisal.
